DIEAP - Surgical Technique

The DIEAP and SIEA flaps consist of skin and fat from the lower abdomen. In contrast to the TRAM flap, no fascia or muscle is sacrificed when these flaps are harvested. As a result, there is no functional loss or weakening of the anterior abdominal wall.

During DIEAP flap dissection, the rectus abdominis muscle is opened along the line of its fibres (fig. 1). The perforating vessels which pierce the muscle to supply the overlying skin are then freed from their surrounding connective tissue (fig. 2). The rectus abdominis muscle is therefore kept intact and its blood supply, nerve supply, function and strength are all preserved.


Fig. 1a Fig. 1b Fig. 1c

Figure 1: Schematic representation of a DIEAP flap (a, b) and the resulting scar on the lower abdomen (c). 

Fig. 2: Splitting the rectus abdominis muscle in the line of its fibers exposes the underlying vessels and nerves.

The deep inferior epigastric vessels are then divided in the groin. This temporarily stops the blood supply to the flap but the tissue can survive like this for 6 hours. The flap is then transferred to the chest wall and positioned over the mastectomy defect. An artery and vein have simultaneously been prepared next to the sternum at the level of the 3rd or 4th rib. These are the internal mammary or internal thoracic vessels (fig. 3), comparable to the deep inferior epigastric vessels, with dimensions of between 1 and 3 mm. Both sets of arteries and veins are then sutured together using an operating microscope. Once connected, blood flow is restored and the flap quickly recovers.

Fig. 3: Possible vessels that serve as recipient blood vessels to connect the flap to.

The final step is to shape the abdominal tissue into an aesthetically pleasing three-dimensional breast, which matches the contralateral side. In a delayed breast reconstruction, there will still be a scar across the new breast, but below this there will be abdominal skin and subcutaneous fat (fig. 4 a-d). A further scar is present along the crease where this abdominal tissue meets the chest wall. In an immediate breast reconstruction, the scars will vary from a nipple-shaped circle to a larger oval, depending on the extent of surgery required to safely remove the tumour. In both forms of breast reconstruction, the abdominal scar lies above the pubic area, passing from hip-to-hip. There is also a scar around the umbilicus (belly button).

Fig. 4a Fig. 4b
Fig. 4c Fig. 4d

Figure 4: Schematic representation of secondary breast reconstruction with a DIEAP flap.

At the donor site, the fascia covering the rectus abdominis muscle is repaired. This closure is tension-free, as no fascia has been resected and synthetic mesh is never required. The remaining skin is then undermined up to the costal margin, the umbilicus brought out again, suction drains inserted and the abdomen closed in layers. Finally, skin adhesive (surgical glue) is applied to the incisions, providing an additional layer of support to the wounds and also acting as a waterproof dressing.

It is possible to restore sensation to the DIEAP flap, if the perforator selected is accompanied by a sensory nerve. This nerve is the anterior cutaneous branch of one of the mixed segmental nerves which supply the rectus abdominis muscle. The lateral cutaneous branch of the 4th intercostal nerve is the preferred recipient nerve, if it can be retrieved at the mastectomy site. When a connection is possible, there is improved sensory recovery in the new breast.

In contrast, the SIEA flap is more suitable when only a moderate amount of tissue is required for breast reconstruction. This is because the perfusion to the flap is less reliable than that in a DIEAP flap and seldom crosses the midline. Overweight patients can be good candidates for an SIEA flap because their superficial vascular system is often well developed and half of a large abdominal panniculus may be more than enough for unilateral breast reconstruction. Bilateral breast reconstruction is another ideal indication for the SIEA flap because it avoids any intramuscular dissection and finally, partial breast reconstruction where a limited volume of tissue is required to correct a secondary deformity following breast-conserving surgery.

Women undergoing DIEAP and SIEA perforator flap reconstruction usually return to their normal routine 6 weeks after surgery. This includes sport, hobbies and professional activities.




Boyd JB, Taylor GI, Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastic and deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:1-14.

Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdomins muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:645-648.

Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:32-38.

Blondeel PN, Boeckx WD. Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(7):495-501.

Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(2):104-11.

Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R, Boeckx WD, Matton G. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(5):322-30.

Selber JC, Serletti JM. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: myth and reality. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):50-8.

Zeltzer AA, Andrades P, Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K. The use of a single set of internal mammary recipient vessels in bilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):153e-4e.